Matthew D. Stephen (2025) Matthew D. Stephen (2025) Stephanie C Hofmann, Yuqian Cai, Laura G\u00f3mez-Mera, Tamar Gutner, Matias Margulis, Diana Panke, Berthold Rittberger, S\u00f6ren Stapel, Matthew Stephen, Moritz Weiss (2025) Matthew D. Stephen (2024) Matthew D. Stephen (2021) Michal Parizek and Matthew D. Stephen (2021) Matthew D. Stephen and Kathrin Stephen (2020) Matthew D. Stephen and David Skidmore (2019) Matthew Stephen and Michal Par\u00edzek (2019) Matthew D. Stephen (2018) Matthew D. Stephen (2017) Matthew D. Stephen (2015) Matthew D. Stephen (2014) Matthew D. Stephen (2014) Matthew D. Stephen (2013) Matthew D. Stephen (2012) Matthew D. Stephen (2011) Michael Z\u00fcrn and Matthew Stephen (2010) Matthew D. Stephen (2009) Matthew D. Stephen and Michael Z\u00fcrn (Eds.) (2019) Matthew D. Stephen (2021) Michal Par\u00edzek and Matthew D. Stephen (2020) Matthew D. Stephen and Michael Z\u00fcrn (2019) Matthew D. Stephen (2019) Michael Z\u00fcrn, Klaus Dieter Wolf and Matthew D. Stephen (2019) Matthew D. Stephen (2018) Matthew D. Stephen (2022) Matthew D. Stephen (2014) Matthew D. Stephen (2012) Matthew D. Stephen (2011) Matthew D. Stephen (2021) Matthew D. Stephen (2020) Michal Par\u00edzek and Matthew D. Stephen (2020) Matthew D. Stephen (2018) Matthew D. Stephen (2016) Matthew D. Stephen (2015) Matthew D. Stephen (2014)
Beyond multilateralism: China\u2019s international order building through transnational policy forums<\/a><\/strong>
The Pacific Review<\/em>, 1\u201326.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Diffusion of Global Power and the Decline of Global<\/em> Governance<\/a><\/strong>
Ethics & International Affairs<\/em>: 1\u201314<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Introducing Organizational (Dis)Entanglements: How Scholarship on Regime Complexity and Power Dynamics Helps Make Sense of International Order-Making,<\/a> <\/strong>
International Studies Review<\/em>, 27(1): 1-29<\/p>\n\n\n\n
China and the Limits of Hypothetical Hegemony. <\/a><\/strong>
Security Studies<\/em>, 33(1): 152\u2013159<\/p>\n\n\n\n
China\u2019s New Multilateral Institutions: A Framework and Research Agenda.<\/a> <\/strong>
International Studies Review<\/em>, 23(3): 807\u2013834.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Long March through the Institutions: Emerging Powers and International Organizations\u2019 Secretariats. <\/a><\/strong>
Cooperation and Conflict<\/em>, 56(2): 204\u2013223<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Integration of Rising Powers into Club Institutions: China and the Arctic Council.<\/a><\/strong>
Global Policy<\/em>, 11(S3): 51\u201360.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The AIIB in the Liberal International Order. <\/a><\/strong>
Chinese Journal of International Politics<\/em>, 12(1): 61\u201391.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
New Powers and the Distribution of Preferences in Global Trade Governance: From Deadlock and Drift to Fragmentation. <\/a><\/strong>
New Political Economy<\/em>, 24(6): 735\u2013758.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Legitimacy Deficits of International Organizations: Design, Drift, and Decoupling at the UN Security Council. <\/strong>
<\/a>Cambridge Review of International Affairs<\/em>, 31(1): 96\u2013121.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance.<\/a> <\/strong>
Global Governance<\/em>, 23(3): 483\u2013502.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2018Can You Pass the Salt?\u2019 The Legitimacy of International Institutions and Indirect Speech. <\/a><\/strong>
European Journal of International Relations<\/em>, 21(4): 768\u2013792.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rising Powers, Global Capitalism, and Liberal Global Governance: A Historical Materialist Account of the BRICS Challenge. <\/a><\/strong>
European Journal of International Relations<\/em>, 20(4): 912\u2013938.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
States, Norms and Power: Rising Powers and Global Order (Review Article).<\/a> <\/strong>
Millennium \u2013 Journal of International Studies<\/em>, 42(3): 888\u2013896.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Concept and Role of Middle Powers during Global Rebalancing. <\/a><\/strong>
Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations<\/em>, 14(2): 36\u201352.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa. <\/a><\/strong>
Global Society<\/em>, 26(3): 289\u2013309.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Globalisation and Resistance: Struggles Over Common Sense in the Global Political Economy. <\/a><\/strong>
Review of International Studies<\/em>, 37(1): 209\u2013228.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The View of Old and New Powers on the Legitimacy of International Institutions. <\/a><\/strong>
Politics<\/em>, 30(S1): 91\u2013101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alter-Globalism as Counter-Hegemony: Evaluating the \u2018Postmodern Prince\u2019.<\/a><\/strong>
Globalizations<\/em>, 6(4): 483\u2013498.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nHerausgegebene B\u00e4nde:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Contested World Orders: Rising Powers, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority Beyond the Nation-State. <\/strong>
Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/em> ISBN<\/abbr>: 978-0-19-884304-7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nBuchkapitel:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance. <\/strong>
In Kurt Mills and Kendall Stiles (Eds.), Understanding Global Cooperation: Twenty-Five Years of Research on Global Governance<\/em>, Leiden: Brill, 445\u2013465.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Representation of BRICS in Global Economic Governance: Reform and Fragmentation of Multilateral Institutions. <\/strong>
In Soo Yeon Kim (Ed.), BRICS and the Global Economy<\/em>, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 361\u2013390.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rising Powers, NGOs and Demands for New World Orders: An Introduction. <\/strong>
In Matthew D. Stephen and Michael Z\u00fcrn (Eds.), Contested World Orders: Rising Powers, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority Beyond the Nation-State<\/em>, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1\u201336.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Contestation Overshoot: Rising Powers, NGOs, and the Failure of the WTO Doha Round. <\/strong>
In Matthew D. Stephen and Michael Z\u00fcrn (Eds.), Contested World Orders: Rising Powers, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority Beyond the Nation-State<\/em>, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39\u201381.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Conclusion: Contested World Orders \u2013 Continuity or Change? <\/strong>
In Matthew D. Stephen and Michael Z\u00fcrn (Eds.), Contested World Orders: Rising Powers, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority Beyond the Nation-State<\/em>, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 368\u2013389.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa. <\/strong>
In Philip Nel, Dirk Nabers and Melanie Hanif (Eds.), Regional Powers and Global Redistribution<\/em>, Abingdon: Routledge, Ch. 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nBuchrezensionen:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Kristen Hopewell, Clash of Powers: US-China Rivalry in Global Trade Governance<\/strong> (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Perspectives on Politics<\/em>, 20(1): 379\u2013380.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Henry R. Nau and Deepa M. Ollapally (Eds.), Worldviews of Aspiring Powers: Domestic Foreign Policy Debates in China, India, Iran, Japan and Russia<\/strong> (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Political Studies Review<\/em>, 12(2): 279\u2013280.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Christophe Jaffrelot (Ed.), The Emerging States: The Wellspring of a New World Order<\/strong> (Columbia University Press, 2008).
Millennium \u2013 Journal of International Studies<\/em>, 41(1): 153\u2013154.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics<\/strong> (Routledge, 2010).
Political Studies Review<\/em>, 9(3): 400\u2013401.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nAndere Publikationen:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Denkmuster wie im Kalten Krieg. <\/strong>
Welt-Sichten<\/em>, 12\/2021.
https:\/\/www.weltsichten.org\/artikel\/39567\/denkmuster-wie-im-kalten-krieg<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
China just co-created the world\u2019s biggest trade block. Is China\u2019s New World Order already here? <\/strong>
The Loop<\/em>, 08 Dec 2020.
https:\/\/theloop.ecpr.eu\/china-just-co-created-the-worlds-biggest-trade-block-so-is-chinas-new-world-order-already-here\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Emerging powers want more staff in international organizations. They have a long way to go, unless there is an alternative\u2026 <\/strong>
The Loop<\/em>, 18 October 2020.
https:\/\/theloop.ecpr.eu\/emerging-powers-want-more-staff-in-international-organisations-they-have-a-long-way-to-go-unless-there-is-an-alternative\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Will International Institutions Fail Again? International Power Shifts and the Future of Global Cooperation. <\/strong>
Briefing Paper No. 249<\/em>, Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
https:\/\/www.fiia.fi\/en\/publication\/will-international-institutions-fail-again<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
India and the BRICS: Global Bandwagoning and Regional Balancing. <\/strong>
Vestnik RUDN: International Relations<\/em>, 16(4): 597\u2013604.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
India, Emerging Powers and Global Human Rights: Yes, But\u2026 <\/strong>
In Doutje Lettinga and Lars van Troost (Eds.), Shifting Power and Human Rights Diplomacy: India<\/em>, Amsterdam: Amnesty International Netherlands, 55\u201363.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Die Zeit, einige Dinge zu tun: Was Chinas \u00f6konomischer und politischer Aufstieg f\u00fcr den Rest der Welt bedeutet. <\/strong>
WZB Mitteilungen<\/em>, 144: 6\u20139.
https:\/\/bibliothek.wzb.eu\/artikel\/2014\/f-18510.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n